Anna Echterhölter: (Dis-)manufacturing Bonds
(Dis-)manufacturing Bonds
(S. 69 – 81)

Anna Echterhölter

(Dis-)manufacturing Bonds
Rural Measuring Practices as Media of Exchange

PDF, 13 Seiten

  • Materialität
  • Medialität
  • Intermedialität
  • Ding
  • Technikgeschichte
  • Postcolonial Studies
  • Medientechnik

Meine Sprache

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte

Anna Echterhölter

Anna Echterhölter

ist wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Institut für Kulturwissenschaft der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und am Exzellenzcluster TOPOI. Sie studierte Physik, Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaft in Berlin und London und promovierte mit einer Arbeit über genealogische Praktiken in der Naturwissenschaft des 18. Jahrhunderts an der Humboldt-Universität und am Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Sie arbeitet zu den Theorien des sozialen Raums und zur Wissensgeschichte der Hilfswissenschaften (Chronologie, Metrologie, Lexikologie). 2009 war sie Mitgründerin der Zeitschrift ilinx. Berliner Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft und Herausgeberin einer Podcastplattform aktuellen Vorträgen im Bereich Raum- und Kulturtheorie (Tonargumente).

Weitere Texte von Anna Echterhölter bei DIAPHANES
Ulrike Bergermann (Hg.), Monika Dommann (Hg.), ...: Connect and Divide

Media divide and connect simultaneously: they act as intermediaries between otherwise disconnected entities, and as a “middle” that mediates, but also shields different entities from each other. This ambiguity gives rise to conflicting interpretations, and it evokes all those figures that give a first clue about this janus-faced relationship of “connect and divide”: gate-keeper, parasite, amongst others. If we give accounts of media before and after their mediated action, we refer to persons and organizations, automatisms and artifacts, signals and inscriptions, and we seem to find it easy to refer to their distinct potentials and dis/abilities. But within the interaction – the “middle” of media itself seems to be distributed right across the mix of material, semiotic and personal entities involved, and the location of agency is hard to pin down. In case of breakdown we have to disentangle the mix; in case of smooth operations action becomes all the more distributed and potentially untraceable – which makes its attribution a matter of the simultaneously occuring distribution of (official and unofficial) knowledge, labour and power. The empirical and historical investigation of this two-faced relationship of “connect and divide” has thus resulted in a veritable “practice turn in media studies.”


The publication studies four aspects of the practice turn in media studies: Media history from a praxeological perspective, the practice turn in religion and media studies, the connecting and dividing lines of media theories concerning gender and post_colonial agencies, and a historical and theoretical examination of the current relationship of media theory and practice theory.